tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post9107439701468603984..comments2024-02-21T23:23:39.177-08:00Comments on Internet Myths, Lies and Misinformation: United States Inc.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-32850727633367025112021-02-25T19:00:22.769-08:002021-02-25T19:00:22.769-08:00So how do we fix this mess?? What are the steps to...So how do we fix this mess?? What are the steps to bring us back to the original Constitution plus the Bill of Rights (the first 10 Amendments)? Because it does no good to eloquently describe the problem unless we come up with a solution. freedomgirl2328https://www.blogger.com/profile/07310479069089345583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-85008409026245280672021-01-19T18:51:44.373-08:002021-01-19T18:51:44.373-08:00Exactly!
Exactly!<br />Janhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12590190648438232976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-64481059881155902132019-12-17T03:50:38.933-08:002019-12-17T03:50:38.933-08:00Article IV of the Articles of Confederation which ...Article IV of the Articles of Confederation which still exist no matter who or whom say it does not, Domestic makes reference to land owned by the United States of America which is land governed by Constitution "of the United States" not Constitution "for the United States" and land owned by the United States of America is found in the Bureau of land management which is under the Constitution "of the United States".<br /><br /><br />Let me guide you to Volume 1 United States Code which is inclusive of Titles 1-4 and Title 5 sections 101-5949 paying attention to Titles 1-4 for this is the Organic Laws of which is the foundation of everything while Title 5 is for government employees. All of Titles 1-4 is Law within Volume 1 and is printed every six years by the United States printing office. There is the United States of America which is land owned and governed by the Constitution "of the United States", in Title 4 of Titles 1-4 not the Constitution "for the United States" which is Title 2 of Titles 1-4. which one finds the term "free inhabitant" in Article IV of Title 2 which is the Articles of Confederation and this is still law no matter who says it is not, but it does not apply within Title 4 and 3 of Titles 1-4 but applies in Title 5 sections 101-5949 for in there does not exist Title 2 which is the District of Columbia and its Territorial Jurisdiction(s) which is under the Commerce clause at Article 1 section 8 of the Constitution "of the United States" in Title 4 of Titles 1-4. Title 2 of Titles 1-4 was never Adopted by Title 4 "Constitution of the United States" but was Ratified by all states whom were part of the Northwest Territory in Title 3 of Titles 1-4 to which there had to be X amount of "free inhabitants in order to establish a Constitution such as Ohio in 1803 with established borders, so in essence the Northwest Ordinance was a limited form of Government until Ratification of Title 2 of Titles 1-4 and establishment of a bordered Constitution respectively and at which point the territorial government was eliminated and there could be no more legislative acts within said area as defined which also leaves the newly formed state in the same position without legislative authority with one exception it could only deal with the Constitution "of the United States" within its confines, so the state such as Ohio moved by resolution to the 1851 OHIO CONSTITUTION to do so in what is called the Dillon Rule which deals with one subject and pointing out that the 1851 Ohio Constitution is still in force for resolutions art not law but only deal with Commerce in Article 1 section 8 of the Constitution "of the United States", not the Constitution "for the United States' and the later is the Republic in 1803 Ohio bordered Constitution and the only land left to govern in said bordered Constitution is Wayne National Forrest, which of course is questionable. Any questions?, pleas read Volume 1 United States Code and become familiar with Titles 1-4 paying close attention to the dates of entry and language you will find out there is no President of the United States of America and only a President of the United States by Oral Oath as an employee. I know this is all confusing...... lolol but this is all the truth. :LOLOLOL Im sorry I had to get that all out lololol I doubt you understand what I was talking about This is the difference between domestic and non domestic. Washington D.C. is a Federal jurisdiction who police their own citizens. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13732343224733943602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-6578333467322901362019-07-20T09:03:20.923-07:002019-07-20T09:03:20.923-07:00Well stated!!Well stated!!anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09665127328311094943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-7475353167758128502018-08-26T23:22:34.734-07:002018-08-26T23:22:34.734-07:00There never was, nor did they ever have any author...There never was, nor did they ever have any authority. They secretly, and unlawfully, drafted a new Constitution to replace the Articles of Confederation, which they were only supposed to amend. After that they achieved everything through the use of trickery & deceit. IZRAULhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02312593261493304150noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-75811248422139295242018-08-26T23:08:47.821-07:002018-08-26T23:08:47.821-07:00Good grief.... Seriously?!
This is an excerpt fr...Good grief.... Seriously?! <br /><br />This is an excerpt from a June 8, 1953, United States Supreme Court decision in “District of Columbia vs Thompson Co.”<br /><br />1. Under Art. I, 8, cl. 17 of the Federal Constitution, Congress had power to delegate its lawmaking authority to the Legislative Assembly of the municipal corporation created by the Organic Act of 1871 for the government of the District of Columbia. Pp. 104-110.<br /><br />There it is, at the very beginning. A reference made by the highest law in the land to the “CORPORATION” created by the “Organic Act of 1871.” There's no myth about it. <br /><br />Sometimes I have to shake my head and just stand in awe of the mass ignorance problem in America. A problem mainly created by racism & religion.<br /><br />And just to clarify, the US and USA are not the same creatures. The US refers to federal government whilst the USA refers to the 50 states respectively. This is why federal prosecutors are referred to as "United States District Attorneys," not "United States of America District Attorneys." And the "United States Attorneys Office" is the Chief Prosecutor for the United States (the Federal Government).<br /><br />And whether anyone likes it or not, there are in fact 2 Constitutions, both of which are illegitimate documents created the purpose of the federal dictatorship that we see today. <br /><br />The original Constitution was the Articles of Confederation. Talk of amending the Articles was continuously pushed by the federalists, so Congress approved the Constitutional Convention as a forum for the delegates to meet & confer. After negotiating a final draft of the agreed upon proposal was to be presented to for the approval by Congress Assembled.<br /><br />The Convention was granted specific authority to discuss an agreement of amendments to the Articles of Confederation. Nobody was given, nor had, any permission to dispose of the Articles or draft a whole new Constitution. Especially one drafted in secret that created a new government by masonic federalists with extreme bias towards federalism. In the real world, that's the definition of a "Coup d' Etat." Believe any fantasy you like but the truth is, it was an illegal, treasonous, usurpation of government & power. <br /><br />The only reason it was accepted is because the federalists made deceptive arguments and promises, whilst thrusting George Washington to the forefront of the Coupe, using his fame & notoriety to help gain acceptance & trust without questions.<br /><br />The trickery & deceit carefully embedded in the Constitution is seen from the very beginning, starting with "We The People." The "People" really refers to the political community, but gives the impression it refers to Citizens. Anyone with common sense and a decent IQ can clearly see references to different factions.<br /><br />Citizens, Militia and People are all referenced in their own right. The 2nd Constitution actually codifies the Property of the United States (Federal Government). When a President takes oath under Article II, they are swearing to protect and defend the "property of federal government." Article VI, the executive oath, would be the real oath to the actual "Office of President."<br /><br />None of this is rocket science. It doesn't require complicated opinions or understandings. Being smart enough to know that the politicians who chose to purposefully side step congressional requirements in creating a new & unauthorized government, in secret, only did so in looking out for themselves.<br /><br />Once you accept & understand the trickery & deceit, it all starts to make perfectly clear sense. These were wealthy & educated Politicians, well versed in the arts of Political language who didn't give a damn about the citizens. The Federal Government did exactly what Patrick Henry and non-federalists feared and predicted. They shifted the sovereignty and rights of a free people to the political class, made them 2nd class citizens and stripped them of money & land. NO MYTHS, NO LIES, NO BULLS#!T. <br />IZRAULhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02312593261493304150noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-80367462392688184072018-08-26T22:32:27.520-07:002018-08-26T22:32:27.520-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.IZRAULhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02312593261493304150noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-63093479046185986062018-06-11T11:12:43.930-07:002018-06-11T11:12:43.930-07:00Exactly!Exactly!Global Access Softwarehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12857217989519864056noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-59660711400571726382018-01-21T07:59:08.617-08:002018-01-21T07:59:08.617-08:00Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciat...Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you writing this write-up<br />and also the rest of the site is also really good.<br /><a href="http://www.massachusettsbankruptcycenter.com/" rel="nofollow">Worcester Bankruptcy</a>Laura Carlislehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13650989393890283419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-51820883139328626962017-10-17T16:29:12.648-07:002017-10-17T16:29:12.648-07:00BTW this isn't some crazy conspiratorial notio...BTW this isn't some crazy conspiratorial notion...the concept of secret interpretations of law is well known. Sometimes brave senators bitch about it on Capitol Hill.Richtereporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05583015745877720355noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-50587717222519585122017-10-17T16:19:20.621-07:002017-10-17T16:19:20.621-07:00Another example would be the Patriot Act....just g...Another example would be the Patriot Act....just google: secret interpretations of Patriot Act. Ultimately law means what power says it means.Richtereporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05583015745877720355noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-79229894777072127792017-10-17T16:03:06.402-07:002017-10-17T16:03:06.402-07:00This legal terminology is expressly and intentiona...This legal terminology is expressly and intentionally written in such a way as to allow for secret, eSoteric interpretations of the law. It's important the eXoteric interpretation can be logically defended, as you have done, in order to hide the actual eSoteric interpretation and the actual legal nature of government; not to accuse you because you may not be aware of this tactic which has been practiced for thousands of years.Richtereporthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05583015745877720355noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-54037233873210148862017-10-10T05:32:08.763-07:002017-10-10T05:32:08.763-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09903155205621790444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-7356793249814456472017-10-10T05:28:35.909-07:002017-10-10T05:28:35.909-07:00I would like to get your thoughts on the informati...I would like to get your thoughts on the information on this page: <br /><br />http://www.dtss.us/four-us-constitutions.htmlAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09903155205621790444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-42694146369830594962017-10-04T17:43:47.487-07:002017-10-04T17:43:47.487-07:00The 'United States' is, in essence, a corp...The 'United States' is, in essence, a corporation. However, it wasn't established by the Organic Act of 1871. It has always been a multi-trillion dollar conglomerate which operates and is identified as a government.HJ33https://www.blogger.com/profile/07135093495889809313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-69028506888347311402017-07-31T11:01:28.855-07:002017-07-31T11:01:28.855-07:00No need to debunk something as insane and patently...No need to debunk something as insane and patently false as "the Moon is made of cheese". Jacob Boglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01785286701939779233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-30665106902599833012017-07-31T10:59:42.036-07:002017-07-31T10:59:42.036-07:00After the Revolution, the Federal Government made ...After the Revolution, the Federal Government made a deal with the various states: their territorial claims (outside of regular borders) in exchange for assuming their war debts. After that, any other land acquisitions (like the Louisiana Purchase) were all done by the Federal Government. So the Feds pretty much owned everything west of the Mississippi, and ceded land to settlers, which then gave rise to new states. So basically, the only land not originally owned by the Feds first (aside from the obvious native peoples), were the original 13 states. Jacob Boglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01785286701939779233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-59320603030303832312017-07-22T06:08:56.481-07:002017-07-22T06:08:56.481-07:00Under what authority does the Federal Government o...Under what authority does the Federal Government own the lands it controls in the USA?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03525397018975357301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-53769685397978453602017-07-03T00:23:49.250-07:002017-07-03T00:23:49.250-07:00My liberal friends wwould love this. It's not...My liberal friends wwould love this. It's not true though. We became a corporation in 1933. America was founded by the Vatican since day 1, debunk that shilly man.shanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08827286898717305125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-6464764132397270622017-03-17T18:13:55.010-07:002017-03-17T18:13:55.010-07:00Whether or not governments, municipalities, etc en...Whether or not governments, municipalities, etc enjoy some status superior to that of their corporations (and how could it be any other way?), nevertheless they are all Legal Fictions and are conventionally denoted with all caps (Capitis Diminutio, Black's Law Dictionary - Revised 4th Edition, 1968) like us, their STRAW-MEN/slaves (duped/disenfranchised sentient beings). The status of our relationship to the "monsters" is still the same!Repeatedly Dissatisifiedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11254803120350357545noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-46200369835298286242016-10-26T08:28:37.644-07:002016-10-26T08:28:37.644-07:00The constitutionally defined limits of the distric...The constitutionally defined limits of the district came to 100 square miles. In 1846 the DC retrocession occurred where Virginia was ceded back the 31 square miles it had given as part of the original city, which meant DC was then roughly 69 square miles in size.Jacob Boglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01785286701939779233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-31656954927915132572016-10-23T08:06:03.554-07:002016-10-23T08:06:03.554-07:00Area- Federal district 68.34 sq mi (177.0 km2)
The...Area- Federal district 68.34 sq mi (177.0 km2)<br />The U.S. Constitution provided for a federal district under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Congress and the District is therefore not a part of any state.<br />A locally elected mayor and a 13‑member council have governed the District since 1973. However, the Congress maintains supreme authority over the city and may overturn local laws. D.C. residents elect a non-voting, at-large congressional delegate to the House of Representatives, but the District has no representation in the Senate.<br />After the passage of this Act, citizens living in the District were no longer considered residents of Maryland or Virginia, which therefore ended their representation in Congress.<br />On August 24–25, 1814, in a raid known as the Burning of Washington, British forces invaded the capital during the War of 1812. The Capitol, Treasury, and White House were burned and gutted during the attack.<br />The District also hosts nearly 200 foreign embassies and international organizations such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization of American States, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the Pan American Health Organization. bent1https://www.blogger.com/profile/06939650035362524118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-62350309067671046942016-10-23T07:57:18.047-07:002016-10-23T07:57:18.047-07:00pretty shallow plowing in that intellectual field....pretty shallow plowing in that intellectual field. either a shill positing a very bad rebuttal or else married to someone who works there whom they are trying to defend but should have stuck to doodling.bent1https://www.blogger.com/profile/06939650035362524118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-56689082421239661412016-09-25T15:36:32.527-07:002016-09-25T15:36:32.527-07:00No, not quite. It means that when the term "U...No, not quite. It means that when the term "United States" is used in that chapter, it applies to all the categories named in 28 USC 3002(15). It does not mean that all of those categories are synonymous. It means that, when reading the chapter, a provision that applies to the "United States" applies to the Bureau of Printing and Engraving as well as Amtrak, as well as an Army regiment. It does not mean that any of these things are equal to each other or to the federal government as a whole. It should also be noted that these definitions only apply to a single chapter of the US Code dealing with federal debt.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03233384221064778432noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093406100135946783.post-34101731918135936292016-08-13T13:01:25.990-07:002016-08-13T13:01:25.990-07:00That's a lousy rebuttal. Since "United St...That's a lousy rebuttal. Since "United States" was defined as a Federal corporation in 28 USC § 3002, any following definitions in the same section that use the term "United States" can be replaced with "Federal corporation". The author's rebuttal now says, an agency, department, commission, board of other entity of the Federal corporation (United States); or an instrumentality of the Federal corporation (United States). If the author is going to rebut legalese, he needs to learn to read legalese.JPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044976805607960048noreply@blogger.com